I think that is quite reasonable tbh. Both my parents started work at 14 as did most between the wars. The idea then was to for a man to work 50 years before he could draw his state pension. * Logic really but who the hell starts work at 14 now? I was 21 before my fisrt full time employment so if I'm expected to work until I'm 70/71 then it's fair enough isn't it? Even more relevant now with so many young people doing useless degrees (which will not see them earn more than if they hadn't done it) before setting off on some stupid gap year jaunt. Many of these buggers wont put anything into the state until they are 25! To expect a state pension after just 40 years employment is stupid! We aren't all bone idle greeks or public servants (similar thing really) are we?
Never mind our fre formed opinions though. One thing that will cock it all up according to this piece in the Gruniad .............
For a glimpse of the future, look to Greater Manchester, where the retail firm Shop Direct runs three big “distribution and returns” centres. It won’t for much longer, says John Harris. It plans to shift the operation to a new, fully automated site. And that would entail the loss of 1,177 full-time posts and 815 roles performed by agency workers. However, it’s just a tiny fraction of the job losses set to follow. Jobs in wholesale and retail account for 15% of UK workers, and the trade is rapidly migrating from the high street to vast automated “fulfilment” centres like the new John Lewis “campus” near Milton Keynes. A “deserted hall of clacks and hums”, it already employs 860 robots. In fact, over the next 15 years and across the UK economy as a whole, more than ten million jobs are estimated to be at risk from automation. It’s a trend that calls for a total overhaul of our welfare system, which “does almost nothing to encourage people to acquire new skills”, but rather works on the expectation “it can shove anyone who’s jobless into exactly the kind of work that’s under threat”. We’ve seen the future... but we haven’t even begun to plan for it.
John Harris / The Guardian
* (btw my Father only retired at 72 after working 58 years! I'd imagine only the Queen will have worked for more years)