I take it '2' is a reference to Dack?
Twas ever thus though. It's dog eat dog in football as we know more than most. I dread to think how the club would be faring without Jack's injection of funds. Lets be honest we were poor as church mice between '65 and Jack taking over in 89. Then we became the richest club in the Championship in 1991-2 and again in 2000-2001 (with Fulham) and we had the best squads and had attracted top managers as a result. By most account we have the best and most expensive squad and wage bill in League one and it's got us promoted.
John Williams said
'We are not a selling club, we are a trading club' and that has to be about right and applicable to every club in varying degrees with the exception of Man City at present. We all recognize the fine example set down the road but Burnley have sold a star a year (to fund the rest of the squad) virtually haven't they? Austin, Rodrigues, Ings, Grayt, Keane, Trippier have all gone for big money and guess what? Good management means they've never been missed! Who in Anfield is talking about Coutinho these days but last season one could have been led to believe that his leaving was the beginning of the end for the scousers. I bet no one would trade him for Salah at this moment in time would they?
So if we sell Dack for big money it'd be a bummer but if that money could see Mowbray use his connections and judgement to sign Armstrong, Chapman and maybe Payne plus see 3 others of similar quality in midfield and defence come in then that's all well and good isn't it?