Here's a thought..........
Vladimir Putin 'could be dead with body double being used' (msn.com)
Vladimir Putin 'could be dead with body double being used' (msn.com)
They use the same company for his avatar that ABBA use.Here's a thought..........
Vladimir Putin 'could be dead with body double being used' (msn.com)
There’s a surprise. I bet the frogs haven’t either.Germany breaking it's promises. Germany has not sent promised large arms to Ukraine, leaked documents show (msn.com)
Correct why would Russia want a nuclear wasteland on their southern border and adjacent to the Donbas region that they covet so much. IMO Putin (if it is him) is full of p*ss and wind.I seem to recall that 30 odd years ago the worlds physicists and scientists came to the conclusion that no one would win a nuclear war as the "winners" would be subject to massive radiation problems plus a decade long nuclear winter as there would be so much ash and fallout in the atmosphere that it would blot out the sun. Crops would fail, pollinators would be killed and the surviving population would slowly starve. That is why should the conflict descend to that I'm of the opinion that someone close to Putin would put a bullet in the back of his head.
All that cutting edge technology didn’t stop the Yanks in Iraq killing more coalition troops than the Iraqis did though?Indeed so. The introduction of the stealth laser guided bombing of the first Gulf War and the GR1 Tornadoes saw the Russians take a step back. 20 years on and they've dared to take their head out of their shell again but this latest conflict is reminding them how much they rely on a numbers game rather than advanced military technology. The US and UK will be poring over the results of their weaponry and steepening their learning curve whilst Russia will be also be steepening their learning curve in a much more negative fashion. There will be a lot of information being gleaned from this conflict which the daily headlines won't pick up on.
In his memoirs Richard Nixon claimed that the Russians were less likely to push the button first because of their inherent racism and the chance that only people of colour might survive.I seem to recall that 30 odd years ago the worlds physicists and scientists came to the conclusion that no one would win a nuclear war as the "winners" would be subject to massive radiation problems plus a decade long nuclear winter as there would be so much ash and fallout in the atmosphere that it would blot out the sun. Crops would fail, pollinators would be killed and the surviving population would slowly starve. That is why should the conflict descend to that I'm of the opinion that someone close to Putin would put a bullet in the back of his head.
Indeed not. Friendly fire frequently is a GI's biggest threat.All that cutting edge technology didn’t stop the Yanks in Iraq killing more coalition troops than the Iraqis did though?
The Military Industrial Complex is what it is always about; creating and prolonging wars and conflicts.I bet the Yanks are loving having this test ground for their weapon’s. Mind you, I bet we are too.
Have a look at the contract they have with Ukraine. All aid is donated to be repaid back in dollars and they can only buy American systems. USA fleecing the world again.I bet the Yanks are loving having this test ground for their weapon’s. Mind you, I bet we are too.
I disagree. The easiest, most self-serving thing to do in this conflict would be to not upset Russia by getting involved, and to not spend large amounts of money supplying Ukraine with weapons and various other aid. A bit like the selfish line Germany and France are taking.The Military Industrial Complex is what it is always about; creating and prolonging wars and conflicts.
Keeping the trillion dollar arms industry continuously going using all their usual lackies (NATO, UN etc. etc.) with the added bonus of being able to use much of the fallout for political gain.