Marlow Rover
Senior Member
Some rumours about a return for Jay Spearing. Left Bolton in the summer after contract negotiations broke down - by all accounts had a good season captaining Bolton to promotion from League One.
Never heard of him but I'm glad it's a striker. We needed another in the squad. Mowbray said he was signing a midfielder so that could still be on and we still need another centre back. Beginning to take shape. I'm looking forward to going down to Ewood tomorrow.Antonsson has officially signed on loan for the whole season. Don't know a great deal about him but Leeds purchased him for 2 million. By league 1 standards he may be very good but its a case of "wait and see" obviously as with Samuel. Anyway I'm glad that Mowbray has noted the need for another striker. Been told the club has definitely made an enquiry about Henderson.
Well if it's no Lenihan then we need twoLenihan or no Lenihan we need another centre back anyway.
I would agree with that. It also gives us the option of sometimes playing Mulgrew in what I consider to his most effective position. centre midfield.Well if it's no Lenihan then we need two
Leave Mulgrew where he is, at centre back, as centre midfield requires much more physically and Charlie is injury prone.I would agree with that. It also gives us the option of sometimes playing Mulgrew in what I consider to his most effective position. centre midfield.
I would say that centre back requires more physically than centre midfield but I know you mean it slightly differently than I do. I am referring to bodily strength and I think you mean stamina so we have our own opinions. I feel that while Mulgrew is by far our most accomplished footballer I feel that he lacks a bit of strength and bulk for centre back and as you say he is a bit injury prone. I think he is more likely to be injured up against a big striker than playing in midfield but as I specified we need to sign another centre back before we have that option.Leave Mulgrew where he is, at centre back, as centre midfield requires much more physically and Charlie is injury prone.
We must agree to differ on this but you strike a bit of common ground with the Pirlo role. I think that would be his ideal position if we sign another centre back.He will run almost twice as far in centre midfield than in defence, make more sprints, high speed running etc. This is a fact of the game these days and because of that his chances of getting injured increase dramatically. I would play him in a Pirlo role in a three as I think he'd be really useful sat in front of the 2 CB's as there outlet to avoid by passing midfield.
I understand what you mean IE he needs more strength to play CB than midfield but most injuries come from the running aspect as opposed to a strength consideration. Also we have no CB's so would need to buy a few to move him into midfield. Playing a brute alongside him may compensate for his lack of strength? The Motherwell Lad for example.
Piss off you pillock. Does that compromise work for you?That's not how it works Alan, I am right and you are wrong OK? That seems a better compromise to me....
LOL, one person looks a Picasso and cries, the next smiles